![]() | ![]() |
| | |||||||
| Notices |
| General Astrophotography Discuss topics related to Astrophotography. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| hello, looking to get started in dslr astrophoto, need advice
Hi there, I'm a new member to this site. I found you guys on the net when I was researching my new hobbie. Here is my story: My wife and I are looking into buying a new camera, one we both can share. She loves to scrape book and I like to stargaze. I've been digging around the web the past few days and here is a list of other items I came across needed for prime focusing astrophoto w/ this type of scope. 1 Feild Flattener 2 focal reducer (2 types 6.3/3.3) 3 (2") female adapter slide to SCT 4 Male SCT to 2" slide adapter 5 XTi adapter to 2" slide 6 Hartman mask 7 Flipe switch w/ some mm eyepiece for focusing 8 processing software of some kind That is it so far, please help to fill in the list as needed. I'm new and in need of the pros. on the rest. thank you. |
| ||||||||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You will also need some way to guide the scope. Computerized guiding is only so good. Any real drift is bad for a picture, so it requires you to be at the helm. There are two main ways to do this. One is called an "Off-Axis Guider" Which sticks a little T-Bar into your assembly to steal off some light, so you can watch what your taking a picture of as its taking the picture. You need an "Illuminated reticle eyepiece" to do this, so you can keep adjusting your scope to keep the illuminated crosshairs over your designated "guide star". The second way is to buy a high power "guide scope" This scope installs in place of your old guide scope, and you can either use the "illuminated reticle" method to manually track your object, or you can but another type of DSI camera which is called an "Auto-Guider" which takes pictures of the stars through the guide scope, and sends signals to the scope to change position to compensate for any change. Another thing is that you will need a Wedge. If you don't have a wedge the stars in your F.O.V. will spin in the picture over time, even if its keeping track perfectly. I'm not going to explain this in this post, but its what happens=p Because of this effect, if you don't have a wedge, your exposures tend to be maxed out at around 3-6 min, depending on proximity to polaris. Clear Skies, and Good luck on your Astro-Photography mission!
__________________ "Don't tell me that man doesn't belong out there. Man belongs wherever he wants to go--and he'll do plenty well when he gets there." ~Wernher von Braun, Time magazine, 1958 Photography: Canon EOS Rebel XTi (400D) -Unmodified Last edited by Buldric; 12-12-2007 at 09:00 AM. |
| ||||
|
Oh yes, and of course, Welcome to Extreme Astronomy Steve =)
__________________ "Don't tell me that man doesn't belong out there. Man belongs wherever he wants to go--and he'll do plenty well when he gets there." ~Wernher von Braun, Time magazine, 1958 Photography: Canon EOS Rebel XTi (400D) -Unmodified |
| ||||
| hello Stevemg
Lookin to take some pictures. Well if its a single arm GOTO you have , good luck...you are going to need it. Im not telling you this to bum you out. You need to get control of the tracking , and with experience with a single arm GOTO ...Exposures for doing Comets, galaxies and nebulae are very, very challenging . The Best way to take quality shots with a single arm GOTO is to get a wedge and polar align . This way you are basically using one servo motor...more stable and less streaking of stars. You will notice the stability right away. Most of the better quality guiding programs are for GEMS(german equatorial mounts) and tie in to a computer and hub and feed back to the auxillary input of the scope for tracking....programs like this a example being ..(maxim DL) And lets not forget about the cash....ching ching. You can take your OTA and put it on a good GEM, a good GEM is about 3 000 to 5000 dollars . I have a CPC 1100 fork mount, its very good for viewing and it does okay for shots , but still no comparison to my buddies GEMS . IF YOU WANT TAKE SERIOUS PHOTOS GEMS are the WAY...period ... otherwise be happy and settle for what you get. For imaging using my single arm GOTO I use a program called guidedog ... It produces a set of cross hairs with a hollow middle and you can click and drag the crosshairs onto a star in a CCD image and manually track and keep the star centered for the duration of the photo...this program is very helpful. and only 20 bucks not 600. I have and use... 2 different webcams for planetary imaging , a CCD deep sky imager , the Meade deep sky imager is flexible enough to do multiple stuff with , but its monochrome so will require filters, and I also have a Canon Rebel XT , I take the family cam and do use it for Galaxies and nebulae this very good but its a ***** peeking thru the little focuser. I also have a focal reducer and barlows. Dave Last edited by dpab; 12-15-2007 at 08:44 AM. Reason: forgot |
| ||||
| Getting Started
Well hello again , I have a few photos that a fellow Edmonton RASCal took. He has the experience and equipment and the quality of the photos show it. His name is Wayne Malkin and has a few photos on line . It's been a busy month or so, collecting lots of data during that last nice run of clear weather, and digging into Photoshop some more when conditions weren't so great. Here are a few shots, both recent acquisitions and a bit of reprocessing of previous data. M31: http://www.pbase.com/wmalkin/image/89877674/original I think this will always be my favourite subject. This latest shot was the start of a planning lengthy LRGB sequence, but I only ever got the first 90 minutes or so of data. Nevertheless, the conditions were so good that night that I think it is my best attempt so far. M44: http://www.pbase.com/wmalkin/image/90511591 This is a simple RGB shot with 20 minutes in each colour, shot between midnight and 2AM yesterday. IC405-410: http://www.pbase.com/wmalkin/image/90283283/ A very wide field shot that includes the Flaming Star Nebula (IC405) at bottom-right, and IC410 at top-centre. The Flaming Star shows a very interesting blue reflection nebula in long RGB shots. I didn't pick that up really in this shot, where almost all of the data is narrow band Ha. Heart & Soul (HaR)GB: http://www.pbase.com/wmalkin/image/88866030 I shared the Ha version of this a while ago. Shortly afterwards I collected 90 minutes of RGB data for each panel (this is a two panel mosaic). Then I spent the last two or three months trying to figure out how to combine the RGB and Ha. I'm really happy with this one. IC1396: http://www.pbase.com/wmalkin/image/90427376 The Elephant Trunk Nebula. The framing is a little off and the elephant trunk is near the bottom of the frame. This is a bicolour narrow band image, just Ha and OIII data combined to generate colours pleasing to my eye, if not exactly scientific. Thanks for looking! thanks Wayne. merry christmas and enjoy ...Dave |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Panasonic L-1 DSLR | elektron | Digital SLR's (DSLR) and Image Processing | 0 | 05-11-2008 05:09 AM |
| Advice for Beginners | Diana | Telescopes | 1 | 03-24-2006 09:29 AM |