Go Back   Extreme Astronomy > Astronomy > General Astronomy
Home Forums Image Gallery Videos Links

Notices

General Astronomy Discuss topics related to Astronomy.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2006
pranab's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MahamayaTala, Garia, Kolkata-86, India
Posts: 17
Is evolution of solar planetary system chaotic?

Chaos is a mathematical concept that has been described here as we understand it" Deterministic randomness" meaning that a chaotic system is deterministic but so complicated. The random chaos theory tell us it is impossible to predict the long term behavior of very complex dynamic system, because all of conditions are not known with precision at any time and uncertanity increases with a time.
The evolution of the entire solar planetary system had been when numerically intregrated for a span of nearly 100 million years, the calculation confirms the evolution of of the system as a whole is chaos with a time scale of ex potential divergance of only about 5 million years[ J. Laskar Nature 338;237;1989] Sussman & Wisdom presented numerical evidence that motion of pluto is also chaos with a time scale for expotential divergance of nearby tragectors of only 20 million years[ GJ Sussman & J Wisdom- science 241;433;1988] what did realy happened in evolution of solar planetary system- chaotic over 100million years? is there any consequences of observed chaotic evolution of solar system? what was the basic mechanism for generating such a chaotic behaviour-?
Professor Pranab Kr Bhattacharya
MR. Rupak Bhattacharya
Mr. Ritwik Bhattacharya
Mrs. Dahlia Mukherjee
www.unipathos.com
Note_ for Reference one can go "The Science- vol 257:1992"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2006
Dragon Star's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 362
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by pranab View Post
what was the basic mechanism for generating such a chaotic behaviour-?
Only one answer to that, it's not a basic mechanism.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2006
dmill1220's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raymond NH
Posts: 364
One theory that I know of, has very small particles and, gas left over after our Sun formed, bumping into each other and settling in the middle of the Solar System's dusty and gaseous disk, they then became lumpy or gravitationally bound and grew over time.

This resulted in utter chaos, as they grew, into rubble piles, they accrued even more matter, and then eventually started perturbing each others Orbits as they were growing, and reaching Planetary size, Gravity became a big factor in shaping what we now know as our System,
smashing themselves into bits or sending other large and small objects toward the sun or ejecting them out of the early Solar System.

The evidence the theory uses as support is all of the impact cratering that has been found on all the Rocky Planets and their Moons, from all of the probes that have been sent to study and photograph the Planets.

The fact is, that we really don't know for sure how many mechanisms were involved in the formation of our System, but I would assume it was not attributed to one basic mechanism.

We could have even captured some objects or moons as the planets were forming, also take into account that we really don't know what happened in the past, when the Planets were forming, such as Galactic Orbital Oscillations or, other Galactic debris, Gas, and the Gravitational effects of Passing Stars as we revolved around the Galaxy and evolved into what we see today.
Dennis
__________________
Dennis Miller
Raymond NH
12 Celestron Starhopper
10 Celestron Starhopper
6 inch Celestron ASGT refractor
8 inch Celstron SCT
Meade DSI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
pranab's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MahamayaTala, Garia, Kolkata-86, India
Posts: 17
Basically two mechanism we think might play in the chaotic evolution of solar planetary system when we consider evoltion in time scale 100 million years are that- simultenious presence of two different expotential time scale in our full solar system integration generated chaos or massive jovian planets themselves evoved chaotically and pluto is independently chaotic in the feild of jovian planets
Professor Pranab Kr Bhattacarya
MR. Rupak Bhattacharya
Mr. Ritwik Bhattacharya
Mrs. Dahlia Mukherjee
www.unipathos.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
dmill1220's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raymond NH
Posts: 364
Hi Pranab,
Since Pluto has an Orbit completely different form the rest of the planets In other words its not orbiting along the Solar systems Accretion disk ,Isn't it quite possible that it may have been captured due to the early chaotic beginnings of our system, by Gravitational perturbations or, a trajectory change due to an Impact?
Dennis
__________________
Dennis Miller
Raymond NH
12 Celestron Starhopper
10 Celestron Starhopper
6 inch Celestron ASGT refractor
8 inch Celstron SCT
Meade DSI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
Dragon Star's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 362
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmill1220 View Post
Isn't it quite possible that it may have been captured due to the early chaotic beginnings of our system...
Thing is other planets also have done this and they have regular orbits...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
dmill1220's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raymond NH
Posts: 364
Hi Dragon,
do you mean that other Planets have also captured Moons?
or, do you mean that other planets have also been captured by our Solar System?
Dennis
__________________
Dennis Miller
Raymond NH
12 Celestron Starhopper
10 Celestron Starhopper
6 inch Celestron ASGT refractor
8 inch Celstron SCT
Meade DSI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
Dragon Star's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 362
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Star
Planets, actually. It's not fact, but it explains distant planets such as Pluto, Sedna, exc...

Here is one senerio.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0412/01passingstar/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2006
dmill1220's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raymond NH
Posts: 364
Hi Dragon!
Read your link completely that you gave me,it says
sedna and the others do not orbit in the same plane as ours.
But its exactly what I was Proposing since the orbital periods and inclination are not within the Sun's Acretion disk.
ITs a very interesting possibility a Chaotic scenario where not only our own several worlds were colliding and sending some into the Sun or out of the Solar Sytem but also gravitational tugs from Galactic Oscillations by Passing stars or a Unseen Nemesis Star in our Orbit around our Galaxy.

there could have been many more planets before gravity and collisions wreaked havoc on all the newly formed Planets or Smaller objects.
__________________
Dennis Miller
Raymond NH
12 Celestron Starhopper
10 Celestron Starhopper
6 inch Celestron ASGT refractor
8 inch Celstron SCT
Meade DSI
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2006
pranab's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MahamayaTala, Garia, Kolkata-86, India
Posts: 17
Dear Danis Mill
I Hope You are correct. In science, we can not often say " Yes 100%Correct" as in science theories are often changing. So near to correct- Thanks
Professor Pranab Kr Bhatacharya
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor Mans Spectroscope for Hard Planetary Nebulas dmill1220 Filters 5 3 Weeks Ago 01:17 PM
Planets in our Solar System Supercell Hunters Solar System 14 07-02-2008 02:23 PM
Rethinking Solar System History? Dragon Star Solar System 1 12-15-2006 07:25 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2005-2008 Extreme Astronomy. All Rights Reserved.