View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Nokton Nokton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 148
Anti-gravity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buldric View Post
The theory of electric field generation in relation to gravity is an interesting one, and yet, we know of objects which have no detectable fields whatsoever, yet exhert a force of gravity, (aka. our own natural satalite).
I understand that this force may be "unknown", or possibly "unexplored", and yet for all other concepts there has been some way to observe these effects in certain ways. We know that the spinning molten outer core of the earth creates a strong magnetic field which protects us from the radation of space. This field has always been observable through "magic needles", and "magic rocks", which we now call "compases", and "rare earth magnets". Of course it is possible that effects given from this field are here! And yet we just dont know what were looking at. But the moon, as far as we know, is fairly inert, and yet it still exherts a gravitational force, with an equivilent ratio to earths gravitational force in accordance with mass, which has a durastically different chemical makup, and moreso chemical states.

I am more drawn to the theory that it may be due to a form of surface tension, or event horizon. We know these things exist, and we know the power they hold. Issac Newton came up with a theory of mechanical bonds somewhat akin to this, saying that objects were held together by "suction". His example being that if you have 2 slates of marble, and place them next to eachother, they stick to eachother, and are hard to seperate, however, if you apply enough force at the fissure line, you can seperate the two slates. This akin to that every object on earth is made up of an infinite number of these infinately small "marble slates" which have a strong binding force, but if you hit them hard enough, the object will break apart. Though I am quite sure he had no knowledge of what an event horizon was, there are a few similarities to the newer theory.

I like to believe however, that I am never close minded, and in this, if you have any published journals, or anything of the such on your energy field theory, I would love to read them. Please leave any links you know of that may be viewed as credible.

Clear Skies,
Buldric.
Hi Buldric,
Thankyou for your considered response, appreciate.
For what it's worth Buldric, watched a docu on anti-gravity.
A copper coil had a high current applied, it levitated.
Prefer your assessment as unexplored, and if I may correct you,
it is the earths inner core, composed mainly of iron, that is responsible
for the magnetic field we are blessed with.
Buldric, what defies our intellect and understanding now, is no barrier
to what we will understand. One has only to read recent history, and
know that. Our only difficulty is having an open mind, you have.
Am pleased.
Thankyou for your contact.
Nokton.
Reply With Quote