Quote:
Originally Posted by Nokton  Sunil,
Please bear with me. Albert spent most of his life trying to
understand gravity. He tried to explain it in relativity theory because
he thought he saw a link. But never did satisfy his mind on this.
Sunil, you will understand that for every positive there is a negative,
matter, antimatter et al. Propose to you dear friend, anti gravity is a real
and genuine concept, the implementation and understanding of it, is another
matter, but I think it is to do with electrical field generation of a kind we not
understand yet, we will,
Nokton |
The theory of electric field generation in relation to gravity is an interesting one, and yet, we know of objects which have no detectable fields whatsoever, yet exhert a force of gravity, (aka. our own natural satalite).
I understand that this force may be "unknown", or possibly "unexplored", and yet for all other concepts there has been some way to observe these effects in certain ways. We know that the spinning molten outer core of the earth creates a strong magnetic field which protects us from the radation of space. This field has always been observable through "magic needles", and "magic rocks", which we now call "compases", and "rare earth magnets". Of course it is possible that effects given from this field are here! And yet we just dont know what were looking at. But the moon, as far as we know, is fairly inert, and yet it still exherts a gravitational force, with an equivilent ratio to earths gravitational force in accordance with mass, which has a durastically different chemical makup, and moreso chemical states.
I am more drawn to the theory that it may be due to a form of surface tension, or event horizon. We know these things exist, and we know the power they hold. Issac Newton came up with a theory of mechanical bonds somewhat akin to this, saying that objects were held together by "suction". His example being that if you have 2 slates of marble, and place them next to eachother, they stick to eachother, and are hard to seperate, however, if you apply enough force at the fissure line, you can seperate the two slates. This akin to that every object on earth is made up of an infinite number of these infinately small "marble slates" which have a strong binding force, but if you hit them hard enough, the object will break apart. Though I am quite sure he had no knowledge of what an event horizon was, there are a few similarities to the newer theory.
I like to believe however, that I am never close minded, and in this, if you have any published journals, or anything of the such on your energy field theory, I would
love to read them. Please leave any links you know of that may be viewed as credible.
Clear Skies,
Buldric.