Hi Guys!
looks like the mystery is solved according to one of the members of another astronomy website,I apparently have discovered a Variable that does not show up on any Images except for a Red DSS image made back in the 50's.
it is apparently so red that it does not show up on any of the the blue plates taken so far, I have been instructed to submit my discovery to AAVSO but Im a little confused as to how to explain this to them, they have a specific format that sort of limits me in explaining what i have discovered. here is a quote from another observer with alot more expierience than I have on such matters, my thanks goes to Bill Wier and Turbo-1 for helping me to figure out just what I discovered
Quote:Mystery solved, Dennis! Follow the link below to go to IRSA, enter the coordinates below the link, and specify a subimage size of 6 arcmin. It'll be a few minutes, but you'll eventually get SDSS and DSS images of the region in question.
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/FinderChart/
13h29m40.70s 47d 8m35.02s
Your star does not show up in any of the 2003 SDSS images, not in any of the 1994 DSS images. It DOES show up in the 1956 dss1r image, but not the dss1b image shot the same night. The verdict is that you have found a variable star AND the star is so red that even at maximum, it does not show up in the blue band of the DSS, just the red. Unfortunately, there was no ir band image shot in 1956 - I suspect that it might have been quite luminous in ir.
Congratulations on being such an astute observer.
Skip