Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blue Fire One implication would be that space is actually a "something". |
Yea, well it
has to be a something, or everything we know about the universe would fall apart. Without it being something Mass would not be able to warp it, which would change so much we know about the universe. The fact of the matter is that their are things we are wrong about, and lots of changes are going to be made about lots of our current theories, and some/most of the theories we have are bogus-much like using training wheels and saying you learned how to ride you're bicycle. Not quite.
We will know much more about space when we finally define much more about Dark Energy and Dark Matter...lots of the stories the universe has to tell lie within the "Darkness".
Quote:
|
You make a good point though - that if a theory is not yet fully developed and verifiable, how can we pretend to fully explain/comprehend some specific thing Within that theory?
|
The problem arises when you take into consideration as to when something is developed and verifiable in the essence that it is indeed true throughout the universe...because that moment never happens until
all the secrets of the universe are revealed to humanity for everything to work as it should. Because although the puzzle looks complete, what if the last piece doesn't fit?
