Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nokton Hi Dragon, thankyou your reply. please explain to me, I ask because
I seek to understand. Does not the BH create the Quasar, the light and
energy produced by gas being accelerated by the massive gravity pull
producing the radiation? |
Radiation in this case is caused by friction if matter around the accretion disk, as matter approaches the edge of the accretion disk it collides with it at incredible forces, and that is what produces your radiation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nokton Dragon, there has been proved a co-relation
between the mass of a SMBH and the speed of the stars orbiting it.
In every galaxy if falls to 0.5% |
The way I understand it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nokton Dragon, no nearby quasars....We look through our telescopes at the very distant past, perhaps this is about interpretation. Andromeda has a core that glows, not with the same brightness as a quasar, but, perhaps the
dying shell of one we see. |
It is possible if that particular quasar devoured only limited amounts of matter in it's life time for it to survive such a long time, and for the primordial universe it seems as though most all quasars devoured a
lot of matter. So probably all that's left in Andromeda is the SMBH. My guesstimate is that smaller galaxies had very quiet quasars, thus spreading less galaxy material, that is where you would likely find some remnant of a quasar today, and if that is true Andromeda is just way too large to have any sort of a remnant. But that is my idea, so don't take it as a scientific fact.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nokton Dragon, the stars containing heavier elements are found towards theouter rim of the galaxy.
Nokton. |
It is possible, but if it were that easy wouldn't we be able to tell this in Andromeda?
Interesting discussion Nokton.
