Help
Subscribe to Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya's Blog
5 Comments
If It Is A Force Why We Can Not Measure Gravity Or Speed Of Gravity?...
AUTHORS_:
*Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya MD(cal) FIC path(Ind), Professor Dept of pathology Rupak Bhattacharya Bsc(cal)MSc(JU), Ritwik Bhattacharya B.com(cal), Somayak Bhattacharya MBA 7/51 Purbapalli, Sodepur, Kol-110, Miss Upasana Bhattacharya – daughter of Prof PK Bhattacharya, Dalia Mukherjee BA(hons) cal Miss Oindrila Mukherjee,Debasis mukherjee-swamiji Nagar Habra; Mrs Chandrani Dutta BSC(Zoology)
*Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education Research 244a AJC Bose Road kol-20 West Bengal, India
Unanswered question about our visible universe in standard model is, surprisingly enough, the contents of the Universe. Obviously, we can only directly `see’ matter that emits light, but today it turned out as a fact that most of the matter in our observable Universe actually does not emit light [dark matter/dark energy]. For example, the visible parts the of galaxies are thought to be surrounded by much larger `haloes’ of dark matter, with a size up to 30 times that of the visible part. If all this matter were visible, the night sky would probably look pretty much like van Gogh’s `Starry night’. Even though we only have indirect evidence for the existence of this dark matter, we do have a reasonable idea yet of what it is. About 5% of the matter of the Universe is visible. Another 5% is invisible `normal matter’, that is, baryons (protons and Neutrons) and electrons. This is probably in the form of massive compact halo objects, such as brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, planets and possibly black holes. Roughly 25% of the matter of the Universe is thought to be `cold dark matter’ (CDM), that is, heavy non-relativistic exotic particles, such as axions or WIMPS (weakly interacting massive particles). CDM tends to collapse (or `clump’) into the haloes of galaxies, dragging along the dark baryons with it. Finally, 65% of the contents of the Universe is thought to be in the form of a `cosmological constant’, that is, energy of the vacuum and gravity: this can also be thought of as cosmic antigravity or the weight of space! Unlike CDM, this never clumps: it tends to make the Universe `blow up’ by making it expanding faster and faster like a balloon blowing with air. In other words, it forces an accelerated expansion which, according to recent data, has begun very recently. These data have been taken very skeptically by some people. In particular, a period of future acceleration of the Universe, while not posing any problems for cosmologists, would be somewhat problematic for string theory as we know it. However, this is not a basis for judgment: `data’ is not a dirty word, `assumption’ and `conjecture’ are dirty words. These ingredients are needed for cosmological model building. One starts with a theoretical model, `adds in’ cosmological parameters such as the age, matter contents and so forth and computes its observational consequences. One must then compare notes with observational cosmologists and see whether the model is in agreement with observation: if it does not agree then one had better start again. In the hope of eliminating some of the shortcomings of the Big Bang model, one needs to generalize the model, and yet unexplored extra dimensions are a good place to look for answers.
Strings and extra dimensions. It is believed that the unification of the known fundamental interactions of nature requires theories with additional space-time dimensions. Indeed, the only known theory of gravity that is consistent with quantum mechanics is string theory, which is formulated in 10 dimensions (Polchinski 1998)-however we human being never experience that. Only in mathematics and theory Even though there are at present no robust ideas about how one can go from these theories to our familiar low-energy space-time cosmology in four dimensions (three spatial dimensions plus time), it is clear that such a process will necessarily involve procedures known as dimensional reduction and compactification. These concepts are mathematically very elaborate, but physically quite simple to understand. Even if the true `theory of everything’ is higher dimensional, one must find how it would manifest itself to observers like us who can only probe four dimensions. Note that this is more general than simply obtaining low-energy or other limits of the theory.
On the other hand, given that we only seem to be able to probe four dimensions, we must figure out why we cannot see the others or, in other words, why (and how) they are hidden. A simple solution is to make these extra dimensions compact and very small.
What is Gravity that Newton once discovered? Of what force/ matter is it composed? Of What Particles the gravity force is made of? Is it the Dark matter? Is it the Dark Energy? Is it the Higg Boson? Is it wrapped up space -time? Space-time however may be defined as an invisible, underlying matrix woven from a double helix having one atomic diameter cross-section and infinite length, always traveling at the speed of light "c" along its axis. Gravity is probably the real power source and regulator of the entire universe. Space-time helix interactions, I can call this invisible double helix the Space-time Helix (STH) because it defines the limits and dimensions of space by its ubiquitous presence and extension. It marks time at the most fundamental level by its resulting crest-to-crest sine wave spacing (wavelength), while traveling at c; and the term "helix" incorporates its cork-screw shape. The STH produces all known rotational phenomena without actually rotating. A traveling helix gives the appearance of rotation without actually rotating, yet it can induce rotation in an intersecting plane of detection through which it slides. We tend to think of a helix in terms of the Archimedes' screw in which a rotating screw lifts water; the screw turns and the water doesn't. The STH works in the opposite manner; the STH doesn't rotate but it causes rotation of the electrons and nucleons formed by two intersecting space-time helices. If the STH were forced to rotate, it would soon twist into a hopeless knot. As long as the double helix travels longitudinally at speed c in a balanced state without lateral displacement or vibration, it remains hidden and does not intrude into our reality. Once the STH is disturbed laterally or longitudinally, by being struck or forced out of balance, it is capable of producing all known vibrational frequency particles, both short-lived and long-lived. The STH is the hidden power source for all that exists and occurs in the universe.
There are four forces commonly recognized in particle physics: strong nuclear force, electromagnetic force, weak nuclear force, and gravitational force, in descending order of relative strength. To that list I would add gyroscopic force, as an expression of the right hand rule. The Clopton Model does not require boson particles to transmit force because the invisible STH acts directly on coupled matter. Force is the direct interaction of the space-time helix with long lived and short lived particles. The space-time helix is the answer to Einstein’s concerns about "action at a distance." Specific forces will be discussed in the sections that follow.
Like magnetism, gravity is indeed the result of warped space-time; but in the case of gravity, the STH flow is bi-directional, or more properly, multi-directional. Space-time is a double helix; and matter or light which is composed of the STH will follow the path laid out by the STH, not because it is the least path, but because it is the only path. Zero-rest-mass photons ride the space-time helices as modulated distortions. Space-time helices are deflected and warped by the lens effect of matter through which they pass, yielding gravity and magnetism. Light photons can be stripped from one STH and applied to another STH at a pair node. Light can therefore be deflected near a planet or star by free floating pair nodes (e.g., hydrogen atoms) held in the gravity of the heavenly body. Both the deflection of space-time helices, and the renormalization between STH pairs, contribute to the apparent bending of light near a star or planet.
Newton who worked out so many useful formulas to apply when working with the actions of gravity was pressed for an explanation as to how gravity works he stated that the force of gravity is due to God. Prof. Albert Einstein considered gravity and came up finally with theories of General Relativity which is the notion that gravity is due to a "bend" in space time and was able to present the situation such that gravity had no "force. Light from a distant object (like a galaxy) gets bent by the gravity of a second object that lies along the line of sight between us and the first object. The simplest of example is Einstein rings. We decided Gravity is an 'Is' and the force of Gravity is Gravitation. So OK science can measure the force - Gravitation - but it can't measure Gravity because it just 'Is'. If God is an entity so is Gravity. Thus Gravity is the same as God our at least a partner in God's doings.
Unlike the familiar ‘normal’ matter that makes up stars, gas and dust, ‘dark’ matter is invisible but its presence can be inferred through its gravitational influence on its surroundings. Physicists believe that it makes up 22% of the mass of the Universe (compared with the 4% of normal matter and 74% comprising the mysterious ‘dark energy’). But, despite its pervasive influence, no-one is sure what dark matter consists of and it is still a hypothetical matter but whose presence in the universe could be inferred from observed gravitational effect. Dark matter could be 85% of the total observable matter in the universe
The ‘true nature’ of dark matter could be revealed by new computer modeling work. The modeling, published in Science, suggests in a universe dominated by “warm” dark matter the first stars could have formed from fragments of filaments thousands of light-years long (study abstract, commentary). “The filaments would have been about 9,000 light years long, which is about a quarter the size of the Milky Way galaxy,” according to study leader Liang Gao of Durham University in the UK “They would have fragmented in a huge burst of star formation, a spectacular event to contemplate.”{The Great Beyond Nature.com Posted by Daniel cressey on 17th Sept 2007
Is Gravity is Dark Matter or WAMP? Is Gravity made of Higgs Boson particle that gave mass to all particles in the universe? Or neutrinos particle?[ Neutrinos are not zero mass particle. if it would be then it would not oscillate] Or is Gravity the Dark Energy? The same unexplained force—dark energy—that causes the universe to fly apart at an accelerating pace is also stifling the growth of galaxy clusters, new research shows. These clusters, cloudlike swarms that are the largest accumulations of matter in the universe, grew rapidly during the first 10 billion years of cosmic time but, due to the dark energy, they can no longer continue to grow.
A giant hole” in the universe has been discovered recently by astronomers from Minnesota. Investing an area of the sky known as the WMAP Cold Spot, Lawrence Rudnick and his colleagues found a very large void empty of stars, gas and even dark matter which is nearly 6 billion trillion miles of emptiness or void .Astronomers had long known that there are big voids in the universe, and think they can explain them with their theories as to how large scale structures first formed. But those theories are hard put to describe a void of such a huge void in the large-scale evolution of the Universe even by gravitational collapse
One common view of constants is as asymptotic states. For example, the speed of light c is (in special relativity) the maximum velocity of a massive particle moving in ®at space-time. The gravitational constant G de nes the limiting potential for a mass that does not form a black hole in curved space-time. The reduced Planckconstant ~ ² h=2º is the universal quantum of action (and hence de nes a minimum uncertainty). Similarly, in string theory there is also a fundamental unit of length(the characteristic size of the strings). So for any physical theory we know of, thereCosmology with varying constants 2683should be one such constant.
Gravity may be also called the electromagnetic force- a force terms like nuclear forces the " in classical or is it just a distortion of space as per general theory of relativity? How does gravity work " In general theory of relativity gravity is defined as the warping of the space-time due to the presence of matter and energy. This seems to imply that space/time has some form of fabric matrix. Can we not detect the gravity directly? Do we not have a gravity meter? The real answer is No. But why not? if it is a measurable force. The gravity is made of a particle may be called Gravitons. I assume the gravitons of all mass in our local universe, are in touch with one another. As we move farther graviton communication between masses stops. As the universe is and farther away from our local universe, at what point (distance or velocity) does expanding faster than speed of light, it seems to me there will be no graviton communication with masses outside of our local universe (distant galaxies). Personally, I like the thought of gravitons of all mass in the entire universe being in constant communication with one another. If one mass moves anywhere in the universe, all of the other mass gravitons know its movement. ""I like it too but wonder if the gravitons communicate instantly or at C. no one has detected a graviton or a gravitational wave.
Is Gravity is made of a particle that gave mass to other particle like Higgs B?
Gravity has ‘Speed of Gravity". There seem to be a general agreement the speed of gravity is the speed of light, but maybe less. Why can I not measure it ? I can measure light intensity. I can calculate recession velocity by red shift. I can see the spectrum of elements detected. There are all sorts of cleaver methods of detecting what we did not previously know.
If a distant galaxy mass can be seen as visible light emitted. Why can I not measure gravity?
AUTHORS_:
*Professor Pranab Kumar Bhattacharya MD(cal) FIC path(Ind), Professor Dept of pathology Rupak Bhattacharya Bsc(cal)MSc(JU), Ritwik Bhattacharya B.com(cal), Somayak Bhattacharya MBA 7/51 Purbapalli, Sodepur, Kol-110, Miss Upasana Bhattacharya – daughter of Prof PK Bhattacharya, Dalia Mukherjee BA(hons) cal Miss Oindrila Mukherjee,Debasis mukherjee-swamiji Nagar Habra; Mrs Chandrani Dutta BSC(Zoology)
*Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education Research 244a AJC Bose Road kol-20 West Bengal, India
Unanswered question about our visible universe in standard model is, surprisingly enough, the contents of the Universe. Obviously, we can only directly `see’ matter that emits light, but today it turned out as a fact that most of the matter in our observable Universe actually does not emit light [dark matter/dark energy]. For example, the visible parts the of galaxies are thought to be surrounded by much larger `haloes’ of dark matter, with a size up to 30 times that of the visible part. If all this matter were visible, the night sky would probably look pretty much like van Gogh’s `Starry night’. Even though we only have indirect evidence for the existence of this dark matter, we do have a reasonable idea yet of what it is. About 5% of the matter of the Universe is visible. Another 5% is invisible `normal matter’, that is, baryons (protons and Neutrons) and electrons. This is probably in the form of massive compact halo objects, such as brown dwarfs, white dwarfs, planets and possibly black holes. Roughly 25% of the matter of the Universe is thought to be `cold dark matter’ (CDM), that is, heavy non-relativistic exotic particles, such as axions or WIMPS (weakly interacting massive particles). CDM tends to collapse (or `clump’) into the haloes of galaxies, dragging along the dark baryons with it. Finally, 65% of the contents of the Universe is thought to be in the form of a `cosmological constant’, that is, energy of the vacuum and gravity: this can also be thought of as cosmic antigravity or the weight of space! Unlike CDM, this never clumps: it tends to make the Universe `blow up’ by making it expanding faster and faster like a balloon blowing with air. In other words, it forces an accelerated expansion which, according to recent data, has begun very recently. These data have been taken very skeptically by some people. In particular, a period of future acceleration of the Universe, while not posing any problems for cosmologists, would be somewhat problematic for string theory as we know it. However, this is not a basis for judgment: `data’ is not a dirty word, `assumption’ and `conjecture’ are dirty words. These ingredients are needed for cosmological model building. One starts with a theoretical model, `adds in’ cosmological parameters such as the age, matter contents and so forth and computes its observational consequences. One must then compare notes with observational cosmologists and see whether the model is in agreement with observation: if it does not agree then one had better start again. In the hope of eliminating some of the shortcomings of the Big Bang model, one needs to generalize the model, and yet unexplored extra dimensions are a good place to look for answers.
Strings and extra dimensions. It is believed that the unification of the known fundamental interactions of nature requires theories with additional space-time dimensions. Indeed, the only known theory of gravity that is consistent with quantum mechanics is string theory, which is formulated in 10 dimensions (Polchinski 1998)-however we human being never experience that. Only in mathematics and theory Even though there are at present no robust ideas about how one can go from these theories to our familiar low-energy space-time cosmology in four dimensions (three spatial dimensions plus time), it is clear that such a process will necessarily involve procedures known as dimensional reduction and compactification. These concepts are mathematically very elaborate, but physically quite simple to understand. Even if the true `theory of everything’ is higher dimensional, one must find how it would manifest itself to observers like us who can only probe four dimensions. Note that this is more general than simply obtaining low-energy or other limits of the theory.
On the other hand, given that we only seem to be able to probe four dimensions, we must figure out why we cannot see the others or, in other words, why (and how) they are hidden. A simple solution is to make these extra dimensions compact and very small.
What is Gravity that Newton once discovered? Of what force/ matter is it composed? Of What Particles the gravity force is made of? Is it the Dark matter? Is it the Dark Energy? Is it the Higg Boson? Is it wrapped up space -time? Space-time however may be defined as an invisible, underlying matrix woven from a double helix having one atomic diameter cross-section and infinite length, always traveling at the speed of light "c" along its axis. Gravity is probably the real power source and regulator of the entire universe. Space-time helix interactions, I can call this invisible double helix the Space-time Helix (STH) because it defines the limits and dimensions of space by its ubiquitous presence and extension. It marks time at the most fundamental level by its resulting crest-to-crest sine wave spacing (wavelength), while traveling at c; and the term "helix" incorporates its cork-screw shape. The STH produces all known rotational phenomena without actually rotating. A traveling helix gives the appearance of rotation without actually rotating, yet it can induce rotation in an intersecting plane of detection through which it slides. We tend to think of a helix in terms of the Archimedes' screw in which a rotating screw lifts water; the screw turns and the water doesn't. The STH works in the opposite manner; the STH doesn't rotate but it causes rotation of the electrons and nucleons formed by two intersecting space-time helices. If the STH were forced to rotate, it would soon twist into a hopeless knot. As long as the double helix travels longitudinally at speed c in a balanced state without lateral displacement or vibration, it remains hidden and does not intrude into our reality. Once the STH is disturbed laterally or longitudinally, by being struck or forced out of balance, it is capable of producing all known vibrational frequency particles, both short-lived and long-lived. The STH is the hidden power source for all that exists and occurs in the universe.
There are four forces commonly recognized in particle physics: strong nuclear force, electromagnetic force, weak nuclear force, and gravitational force, in descending order of relative strength. To that list I would add gyroscopic force, as an expression of the right hand rule. The Clopton Model does not require boson particles to transmit force because the invisible STH acts directly on coupled matter. Force is the direct interaction of the space-time helix with long lived and short lived particles. The space-time helix is the answer to Einstein’s concerns about "action at a distance." Specific forces will be discussed in the sections that follow.
Like magnetism, gravity is indeed the result of warped space-time; but in the case of gravity, the STH flow is bi-directional, or more properly, multi-directional. Space-time is a double helix; and matter or light which is composed of the STH will follow the path laid out by the STH, not because it is the least path, but because it is the only path. Zero-rest-mass photons ride the space-time helices as modulated distortions. Space-time helices are deflected and warped by the lens effect of matter through which they pass, yielding gravity and magnetism. Light photons can be stripped from one STH and applied to another STH at a pair node. Light can therefore be deflected near a planet or star by free floating pair nodes (e.g., hydrogen atoms) held in the gravity of the heavenly body. Both the deflection of space-time helices, and the renormalization between STH pairs, contribute to the apparent bending of light near a star or planet.
Newton who worked out so many useful formulas to apply when working with the actions of gravity was pressed for an explanation as to how gravity works he stated that the force of gravity is due to God. Prof. Albert Einstein considered gravity and came up finally with theories of General Relativity which is the notion that gravity is due to a "bend" in space time and was able to present the situation such that gravity had no "force. Light from a distant object (like a galaxy) gets bent by the gravity of a second object that lies along the line of sight between us and the first object. The simplest of example is Einstein rings. We decided Gravity is an 'Is' and the force of Gravity is Gravitation. So OK science can measure the force - Gravitation - but it can't measure Gravity because it just 'Is'. If God is an entity so is Gravity. Thus Gravity is the same as God our at least a partner in God's doings.
Unlike the familiar ‘normal’ matter that makes up stars, gas and dust, ‘dark’ matter is invisible but its presence can be inferred through its gravitational influence on its surroundings. Physicists believe that it makes up 22% of the mass of the Universe (compared with the 4% of normal matter and 74% comprising the mysterious ‘dark energy’). But, despite its pervasive influence, no-one is sure what dark matter consists of and it is still a hypothetical matter but whose presence in the universe could be inferred from observed gravitational effect. Dark matter could be 85% of the total observable matter in the universe
The ‘true nature’ of dark matter could be revealed by new computer modeling work. The modeling, published in Science, suggests in a universe dominated by “warm” dark matter the first stars could have formed from fragments of filaments thousands of light-years long (study abstract, commentary). “The filaments would have been about 9,000 light years long, which is about a quarter the size of the Milky Way galaxy,” according to study leader Liang Gao of Durham University in the UK “They would have fragmented in a huge burst of star formation, a spectacular event to contemplate.”{The Great Beyond Nature.com Posted by Daniel cressey on 17th Sept 2007
Is Gravity is Dark Matter or WAMP? Is Gravity made of Higgs Boson particle that gave mass to all particles in the universe? Or neutrinos particle?[ Neutrinos are not zero mass particle. if it would be then it would not oscillate] Or is Gravity the Dark Energy? The same unexplained force—dark energy—that causes the universe to fly apart at an accelerating pace is also stifling the growth of galaxy clusters, new research shows. These clusters, cloudlike swarms that are the largest accumulations of matter in the universe, grew rapidly during the first 10 billion years of cosmic time but, due to the dark energy, they can no longer continue to grow.
A giant hole” in the universe has been discovered recently by astronomers from Minnesota. Investing an area of the sky known as the WMAP Cold Spot, Lawrence Rudnick and his colleagues found a very large void empty of stars, gas and even dark matter which is nearly 6 billion trillion miles of emptiness or void .Astronomers had long known that there are big voids in the universe, and think they can explain them with their theories as to how large scale structures first formed. But those theories are hard put to describe a void of such a huge void in the large-scale evolution of the Universe even by gravitational collapse
One common view of constants is as asymptotic states. For example, the speed of light c is (in special relativity) the maximum velocity of a massive particle moving in ®at space-time. The gravitational constant G de nes the limiting potential for a mass that does not form a black hole in curved space-time. The reduced Planckconstant ~ ² h=2º is the universal quantum of action (and hence de nes a minimum uncertainty). Similarly, in string theory there is also a fundamental unit of length(the characteristic size of the strings). So for any physical theory we know of, thereCosmology with varying constants 2683should be one such constant.
Gravity may be also called the electromagnetic force- a force terms like nuclear forces the " in classical or is it just a distortion of space as per general theory of relativity? How does gravity work " In general theory of relativity gravity is defined as the warping of the space-time due to the presence of matter and energy. This seems to imply that space/time has some form of fabric matrix. Can we not detect the gravity directly? Do we not have a gravity meter? The real answer is No. But why not? if it is a measurable force. The gravity is made of a particle may be called Gravitons. I assume the gravitons of all mass in our local universe, are in touch with one another. As we move farther graviton communication between masses stops. As the universe is and farther away from our local universe, at what point (distance or velocity) does expanding faster than speed of light, it seems to me there will be no graviton communication with masses outside of our local universe (distant galaxies). Personally, I like the thought of gravitons of all mass in the entire universe being in constant communication with one another. If one mass moves anywhere in the universe, all of the other mass gravitons know its movement. ""I like it too but wonder if the gravitons communicate instantly or at C. no one has detected a graviton or a gravitational wave.
Is Gravity is made of a particle that gave mass to other particle like Higgs B?
Gravity has ‘Speed of Gravity". There seem to be a general agreement the speed of gravity is the speed of light, but maybe less. Why can I not measure it ? I can measure light intensity. I can calculate recession velocity by red shift. I can see the spectrum of elements detected. There are all sorts of cleaver methods of detecting what we did not previously know.
If a distant galaxy mass can be seen as visible light emitted. Why can I not measure gravity?
Categories: Uncategorized
Share This Entry:
5 Comments On This Entry
Page 1 of 1
Guest
09 June 2010 - 03:41 AM
It is realy a Very Tough question What a Gravity is.and why we can not Measure it.
May be a zero mass particle? Want to Win Nobel Prize? You can Work on it
May be a zero mass particle? Want to Win Nobel Prize? You can Work on it
Guest
25 June 2010 - 03:54 AM
This is very interesting. I do not think about these things very much. But wonder if it is possible for pollution on the earth or other planets to effect the universe and the things you are talking about? Or is the composition of the universe stronger than the pollution? I don't know if it is happening now, but in the 1970's the USA considered sending garbage into outer space.
Guest
25 June 2010 - 03:57 AM
Also, I have heard that old satellites and other electronic equipment can be a problem.
Guest
12 July 2010 - 04:32 AM
Can LHC be able to find zero mass particles at all?. If the experiment can find it
professor Bhattacharya's theory will satisfy our inquisitiveness on Gravity and
many things like how mass came. Let us Hope for it. Congratulation professor
Bhattacharya for such a nice and very interesting theory on Gravity
professor Bhattacharya's theory will satisfy our inquisitiveness on Gravity and
many things like how mass came. Let us Hope for it. Congratulation professor
Bhattacharya for such a nice and very interesting theory on Gravity
Guest
29 August 2010 - 08:54 PM
Dear "Authors":
Ninety percent of paragraphs three and four was lifted entirely and almost verbatim from my website spacetimehelix.com. Your paragraph three is taken from sections 2 and 14 of my paper, and the paragraph four is taken from section 17. You did not use proper citation, quotes, or a web link. You did however leave the name Clopton Model, which is at least some acknowledgement. The material you borrowed is fully copyrighted and was filed with the Library of Congress in 2006. The copyright notice reads "© Copyright 2006 Roland Weiss Clopton, All Rights Reserved. Permission is granted to print or save copies of this paper without modification for review purposes, but not for sale or profit." You did however modify my text by inserting the sentence "Gravity is probably the real power source and regulator of the entire universe." I absolutely DO NOT agree with that statement, which violates the whole premise of my thesis. I spent 35 years developing and researching this paper. It was first published in early form in 1974 as "The Nature and Dissolution of Matter." That first paper was also copyrighted and filed with the Library of congress.
I expect you to do one of two things immediately: 1) Remove all "borrowed" material from your website; or 2) Remove the offending sentence you added, and use proper quotes and citations for other's work, with a link to spacetimehelix.com so that readers can get a more thorough treatment of the substructure underlying all space, time, matter, energy, and physical phenomena.
I worked on this study for half a lifetime to determine if such a substructure is really feasible, because if it does exist, it may be possible to initiate the unraveling of the underlying space time helices, with the subsequent release of all binding energy packed into all protons at the moment of the Big Bang. That unraveling would propagate slightly faster than the speed of light. It would be total, final, and even God Himself couldn't stop it once it begins. It is literally an unquenchable fire. My immediate concern is that such a device may already exist in the form of a huge multi-billion dollar research facility intended to ignite nuclear fusion from hydrogen pellets using 192 massive beam lines of coherent, evenly pulsed laser light trained on an area of space-time the size of a pencil point.
While such fusion exists in the sun, that is always a chaos process. Chaos is our friend. The project I am referring to fires all 192 lasers from a single digital control card, and divides the uniformly pulsed light from each laser bank simultaneously through a switching network of equal beam lengths into fiber optics that focus the same light source into opposing directions headlong onto itself, crest to crest. Light is the only thing that can penetrate and affect the space time helix (STH). In stellar furnaces, chaos protects the space time helix. But in this research facility, because our nuclear studies are fragmented, no one has considered the potential consequences of turning fully coherent, high energy light in direct opposition back onto itself. The purpose of this facility is to use light to compress hydrogen fuel for fusion research, and to compress a tiny uranium pellet to evaluate the aging status of the U.S. nuclear weapon stockpile.
The uniform light frequency of the 192 lasers will impose what amounts to a saw tooth pattern (a superimposed amplitude-modulated AM wave form) onto each light beam, and each beam line is then turned back on itself. Electromagnetic repulsion will enable the opposing light beams to slide past each other harmlessly, that is just until the uranium pellet is compressed and ignited as a nuclear explosion in the very large reaction chamber, which was called the "Death Star" during its construction, named after the Star Wars creation it resembled. Uranium has 92 protons and about 143 neutrons in each molecule, so there will be millions of proton knots in the pellet through which the space time helices travel. The proton knots give mass properties to the STH structure, so the exploding uranium pellet could provide literally millions of laterally driving force particles that could smash two equally divided beams of very high-energy, modulated, pulsed light headlong into each other. The space time helices are very strong and resilient to withstand the continuous stretching of an expanding universe, but they may not be strong enough to resist an impact with themselves headlong, each light beam carrying a saw tooth modulated pattern to snag its opposing counterpart. The resultant tearing of space time and its explosion would be so massive and sudden, that we would know only a moment of intense pain as the plant disintegrated and dissolved, along with the remainder of the universe.
That is a pretty wild scenario, but it is being played out based on a Standard Model that still can't unite relativity, wave mechanics, and particle physics. We are dealing with forces beyond our comprehension, based on a fragmented scientific community where each person has a part of a yet to be seen bigger picture. We need to step back and look at the whole forest for once, instead of focusing on twigs and leaves. The universe is composed of pure vibration. Lateral impact vibration imposed on magnetically stiffened helices produces the short lived particles. Longitudinal displacement along the STH creates the zero-rest-mass photon, which conveys all forces and light. Two STH play each other in a knot to create the self-sustaining proton which doesn't decay. To try and understand the universe as a collection of random particles is equivalent to attempting to understand a B-flat note or F-sharp note, without considering the violin, piano, or guitar string on which it was created. The universe is PURE VIBRATION, imposed on and by the STH. To understand particle discoveries properly, it is necessary to treat the particle, the photons that display the particle, the detection chamber, the accelerator beam lines, and the electronic power sources driving the magnetic accelerators, as a SINGLE SYSTEM, which are being viewed by human eyes composed of the same underlying structure that composes the instruments. We are a part of the system, so we must look beyond our senses and present limits and consider all know phenomena simultaneously and objectively, with no inter-discipline bias. But don't worry. It only takes thirty years to figure it out, if we have that long.
Roland Weiss Clopton
spacetimehelix.com
Ninety percent of paragraphs three and four was lifted entirely and almost verbatim from my website spacetimehelix.com. Your paragraph three is taken from sections 2 and 14 of my paper, and the paragraph four is taken from section 17. You did not use proper citation, quotes, or a web link. You did however leave the name Clopton Model, which is at least some acknowledgement. The material you borrowed is fully copyrighted and was filed with the Library of Congress in 2006. The copyright notice reads "© Copyright 2006 Roland Weiss Clopton, All Rights Reserved. Permission is granted to print or save copies of this paper without modification for review purposes, but not for sale or profit." You did however modify my text by inserting the sentence "Gravity is probably the real power source and regulator of the entire universe." I absolutely DO NOT agree with that statement, which violates the whole premise of my thesis. I spent 35 years developing and researching this paper. It was first published in early form in 1974 as "The Nature and Dissolution of Matter." That first paper was also copyrighted and filed with the Library of congress.
I expect you to do one of two things immediately: 1) Remove all "borrowed" material from your website; or 2) Remove the offending sentence you added, and use proper quotes and citations for other's work, with a link to spacetimehelix.com so that readers can get a more thorough treatment of the substructure underlying all space, time, matter, energy, and physical phenomena.
I worked on this study for half a lifetime to determine if such a substructure is really feasible, because if it does exist, it may be possible to initiate the unraveling of the underlying space time helices, with the subsequent release of all binding energy packed into all protons at the moment of the Big Bang. That unraveling would propagate slightly faster than the speed of light. It would be total, final, and even God Himself couldn't stop it once it begins. It is literally an unquenchable fire. My immediate concern is that such a device may already exist in the form of a huge multi-billion dollar research facility intended to ignite nuclear fusion from hydrogen pellets using 192 massive beam lines of coherent, evenly pulsed laser light trained on an area of space-time the size of a pencil point.
While such fusion exists in the sun, that is always a chaos process. Chaos is our friend. The project I am referring to fires all 192 lasers from a single digital control card, and divides the uniformly pulsed light from each laser bank simultaneously through a switching network of equal beam lengths into fiber optics that focus the same light source into opposing directions headlong onto itself, crest to crest. Light is the only thing that can penetrate and affect the space time helix (STH). In stellar furnaces, chaos protects the space time helix. But in this research facility, because our nuclear studies are fragmented, no one has considered the potential consequences of turning fully coherent, high energy light in direct opposition back onto itself. The purpose of this facility is to use light to compress hydrogen fuel for fusion research, and to compress a tiny uranium pellet to evaluate the aging status of the U.S. nuclear weapon stockpile.
The uniform light frequency of the 192 lasers will impose what amounts to a saw tooth pattern (a superimposed amplitude-modulated AM wave form) onto each light beam, and each beam line is then turned back on itself. Electromagnetic repulsion will enable the opposing light beams to slide past each other harmlessly, that is just until the uranium pellet is compressed and ignited as a nuclear explosion in the very large reaction chamber, which was called the "Death Star" during its construction, named after the Star Wars creation it resembled. Uranium has 92 protons and about 143 neutrons in each molecule, so there will be millions of proton knots in the pellet through which the space time helices travel. The proton knots give mass properties to the STH structure, so the exploding uranium pellet could provide literally millions of laterally driving force particles that could smash two equally divided beams of very high-energy, modulated, pulsed light headlong into each other. The space time helices are very strong and resilient to withstand the continuous stretching of an expanding universe, but they may not be strong enough to resist an impact with themselves headlong, each light beam carrying a saw tooth modulated pattern to snag its opposing counterpart. The resultant tearing of space time and its explosion would be so massive and sudden, that we would know only a moment of intense pain as the plant disintegrated and dissolved, along with the remainder of the universe.
That is a pretty wild scenario, but it is being played out based on a Standard Model that still can't unite relativity, wave mechanics, and particle physics. We are dealing with forces beyond our comprehension, based on a fragmented scientific community where each person has a part of a yet to be seen bigger picture. We need to step back and look at the whole forest for once, instead of focusing on twigs and leaves. The universe is composed of pure vibration. Lateral impact vibration imposed on magnetically stiffened helices produces the short lived particles. Longitudinal displacement along the STH creates the zero-rest-mass photon, which conveys all forces and light. Two STH play each other in a knot to create the self-sustaining proton which doesn't decay. To try and understand the universe as a collection of random particles is equivalent to attempting to understand a B-flat note or F-sharp note, without considering the violin, piano, or guitar string on which it was created. The universe is PURE VIBRATION, imposed on and by the STH. To understand particle discoveries properly, it is necessary to treat the particle, the photons that display the particle, the detection chamber, the accelerator beam lines, and the electronic power sources driving the magnetic accelerators, as a SINGLE SYSTEM, which are being viewed by human eyes composed of the same underlying structure that composes the instruments. We are a part of the system, so we must look beyond our senses and present limits and consider all know phenomena simultaneously and objectively, with no inter-discipline bias. But don't worry. It only takes thirty years to figure it out, if we have that long.
Roland Weiss Clopton
spacetimehelix.com
Page 1 of 1
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks for this entry [ Trackback URL ]
← September 2010 →
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Recent Entries
-
-
-
What Is Gravity? Is It A Force By Zero Mass Particle?
on Jun 07 2010 06:57 AM
My Blog Links
Recent Comments
-
-
Amit Roy from United Kingdom on Aug 26 2010 07:22 AM
Title-: Hello! Are We Alone? If You're Like Me, You May Want To Know Me!
-
-
-
1 user(s) viewing
1 Guests
0 member(s)
0 anonymous member(s)
0 member(s)
0 anonymous member(s)
